btrfs: make the rule checking more readable for should_cow_block()

btrfs: make the rule checking more readable for should_cow_block()

It's quite hard and unreadable the way the rule checks are organized in
should_cow_block(). We have a single if statement that returns 0 (false)
and it checks several conditions, with one them being a negated compound
condition which is particularly hard to reason immediately.

Improve on this by using multiple if statements, each checking a single
condition and returning immediately. Also change the return type from an
integer to a boolean, since all we need is to return true or false.

At least on x86_64 with Debian's gcc 14.2.0-19, this also reduces the
object code size by 64 bytes.

Before this change:

   $ size fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko
      text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
   1913327	 161567	  15592	2090486	 1fe5f6	fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko

After this change:

   $ size fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko
      text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
   1913263	 161567	  15592	2090422	 1fe5b6	fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>