During DT-binding review for extending the V4L2 camera sensor privacy LED
support to systems using devicetree, it has come up that having a "-led"
suffix for the LED name / con_id is undesirable since it already is clear
that it is a LED.
Drop the "-led" suffix from the con_id in both the lookup table in
the int3472 code, as well as from the con_id led_get() argument in
the v4l2-subdev code.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hansg@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil+cisco@kernel.org>
int v4l2_subdev_get_privacy_led(struct v4l2_subdev *sd)
{
#if IS_REACHABLE(CONFIG_LEDS_CLASS)
- sd->privacy_led = led_get(sd->dev, "privacy-led");
+ sd->privacy_led = led_get(sd->dev, "privacy");
if (IS_ERR(sd->privacy_led) && PTR_ERR(sd->privacy_led) != -ENOENT)
return dev_err_probe(sd->dev, PTR_ERR(sd->privacy_led),
"getting privacy LED\n");
int3472->pled.lookup.provider = int3472->pled.name;
int3472->pled.lookup.dev_id = int3472->sensor_name;
- int3472->pled.lookup.con_id = "privacy-led";
+ int3472->pled.lookup.con_id = "privacy";
led_add_lookup(&int3472->pled.lookup);
return 0;