]> Gentwo Git Trees - linux/.git/commitdiff
trace/pid_list: optimize pid_list->lock contention
authorYongliang Gao <leonylgao@tencent.com>
Thu, 13 Nov 2025 00:02:52 +0000 (08:02 +0800)
committerSteven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Thu, 13 Nov 2025 20:15:54 +0000 (15:15 -0500)
When the system has many cores and task switching is frequent,
setting set_ftrace_pid can cause frequent pid_list->lock contention
and high system sys usage.

For example, in a 288-core VM environment, we observed 267 CPUs
experiencing contention on pid_list->lock, with stack traces showing:

 #4 [ffffa6226fb4bc70] native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath at ffffffff99cd4b7e
 #5 [ffffa6226fb4bc90] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave at ffffffff99cd3e36
 #6 [ffffa6226fb4bca0] trace_pid_list_is_set at ffffffff99267554
 #7 [ffffa6226fb4bcc0] trace_ignore_this_task at ffffffff9925c288
 #8 [ffffa6226fb4bcd8] ftrace_filter_pid_sched_switch_probe at ffffffff99246efe
 #9 [ffffa6226fb4bcf0] __schedule at ffffffff99ccd161

Replaces the existing spinlock with a seqlock to allow concurrent readers,
while maintaining write exclusivity.

Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251113000252.1058144-1-leonylgao@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Huang Cun <cunhuang@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Yongliang Gao <leonylgao@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
kernel/trace/pid_list.c
kernel/trace/pid_list.h

index 090bb5ea4a195cca73619b874bc2fe2ac5471236..dbee72d69d0ae232782fe0976112ee28de1a4a59 100644 (file)
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
  * Copyright (C) 2021 VMware Inc, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
  */
 #include <linux/spinlock.h>
+#include <linux/seqlock.h>
 #include <linux/irq_work.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 #include "trace.h"
@@ -126,7 +127,7 @@ bool trace_pid_list_is_set(struct trace_pid_list *pid_list, unsigned int pid)
 {
        union upper_chunk *upper_chunk;
        union lower_chunk *lower_chunk;
-       unsigned long flags;
+       unsigned int seq;
        unsigned int upper1;
        unsigned int upper2;
        unsigned int lower;
@@ -138,14 +139,16 @@ bool trace_pid_list_is_set(struct trace_pid_list *pid_list, unsigned int pid)
        if (pid_split(pid, &upper1, &upper2, &lower) < 0)
                return false;
 
-       raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pid_list->lock, flags);
-       upper_chunk = pid_list->upper[upper1];
-       if (upper_chunk) {
-               lower_chunk = upper_chunk->data[upper2];
-               if (lower_chunk)
-                       ret = test_bit(lower, lower_chunk->data);
-       }
-       raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pid_list->lock, flags);
+       do {
+               seq = read_seqcount_begin(&pid_list->seqcount);
+               ret = false;
+               upper_chunk = pid_list->upper[upper1];
+               if (upper_chunk) {
+                       lower_chunk = upper_chunk->data[upper2];
+                       if (lower_chunk)
+                               ret = test_bit(lower, lower_chunk->data);
+               }
+       } while (read_seqcount_retry(&pid_list->seqcount, seq));
 
        return ret;
 }
@@ -178,6 +181,7 @@ int trace_pid_list_set(struct trace_pid_list *pid_list, unsigned int pid)
                return -EINVAL;
 
        raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pid_list->lock, flags);
+       write_seqcount_begin(&pid_list->seqcount);
        upper_chunk = pid_list->upper[upper1];
        if (!upper_chunk) {
                upper_chunk = get_upper_chunk(pid_list);
@@ -199,6 +203,7 @@ int trace_pid_list_set(struct trace_pid_list *pid_list, unsigned int pid)
        set_bit(lower, lower_chunk->data);
        ret = 0;
  out:
+       write_seqcount_end(&pid_list->seqcount);
        raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pid_list->lock, flags);
        return ret;
 }
@@ -230,6 +235,7 @@ int trace_pid_list_clear(struct trace_pid_list *pid_list, unsigned int pid)
                return -EINVAL;
 
        raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pid_list->lock, flags);
+       write_seqcount_begin(&pid_list->seqcount);
        upper_chunk = pid_list->upper[upper1];
        if (!upper_chunk)
                goto out;
@@ -250,6 +256,7 @@ int trace_pid_list_clear(struct trace_pid_list *pid_list, unsigned int pid)
                }
        }
  out:
+       write_seqcount_end(&pid_list->seqcount);
        raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pid_list->lock, flags);
        return 0;
 }
@@ -340,8 +347,10 @@ static void pid_list_refill_irq(struct irq_work *iwork)
 
  again:
        raw_spin_lock(&pid_list->lock);
+       write_seqcount_begin(&pid_list->seqcount);
        upper_count = CHUNK_ALLOC - pid_list->free_upper_chunks;
        lower_count = CHUNK_ALLOC - pid_list->free_lower_chunks;
+       write_seqcount_end(&pid_list->seqcount);
        raw_spin_unlock(&pid_list->lock);
 
        if (upper_count <= 0 && lower_count <= 0)
@@ -370,6 +379,7 @@ static void pid_list_refill_irq(struct irq_work *iwork)
        }
 
        raw_spin_lock(&pid_list->lock);
+       write_seqcount_begin(&pid_list->seqcount);
        if (upper) {
                *upper_next = pid_list->upper_list;
                pid_list->upper_list = upper;
@@ -380,6 +390,7 @@ static void pid_list_refill_irq(struct irq_work *iwork)
                pid_list->lower_list = lower;
                pid_list->free_lower_chunks += lcnt;
        }
+       write_seqcount_end(&pid_list->seqcount);
        raw_spin_unlock(&pid_list->lock);
 
        /*
@@ -419,6 +430,7 @@ struct trace_pid_list *trace_pid_list_alloc(void)
        init_irq_work(&pid_list->refill_irqwork, pid_list_refill_irq);
 
        raw_spin_lock_init(&pid_list->lock);
+       seqcount_raw_spinlock_init(&pid_list->seqcount, &pid_list->lock);
 
        for (i = 0; i < CHUNK_ALLOC; i++) {
                union upper_chunk *chunk;
index 62e73f1ac85ff989786e6a7cb48257e1b761fa26..0b45fb0eadb9709537cb2c03933515961d4a5031 100644 (file)
@@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ union upper_chunk {
 };
 
 struct trace_pid_list {
+       seqcount_raw_spinlock_t         seqcount;
        raw_spinlock_t                  lock;
        struct irq_work                 refill_irqwork;
        union upper_chunk               *upper[UPPER1_SIZE]; // 1 or 2K in size