The affinity to set to the rescuers should be consistent in all paths
when a rescuer is in detached state. The affinity could be either
wq_unbound_cpumask or unbound_effective_cpumask(wq).
Related paths:
rescuer's worker_detach_from_pool()
update wq_unbound_cpumask
update wq's cpumask
init_rescuer()
Both affinities are Ok as long as they are consistent in all paths.
In the commit
449b31ad2937 ("workqueue: Init rescuer's affinities as
the wq's effective cpumask") makes init_rescuer use
unbound_effective_cpumask(wq) which is consistent with then
apply_wqattrs_commit().
But using unbound_effective_cpumask(wq) requres much more code to
maintain the consistency, and it doesn't make much sense since the
affinity is only effective when the rescuer is not processing works.
wq_unbound_cpumask is more favorable.
So apply_wqattrs_commit() and the path of "updating wq's cpumask" had
been changed to not update the rescuer's affinity, and both the paths
of "updating wq_unbound_cpumask" and "rescuer's
worker_detach_from_pool()" had been changed to use wq_unbound_cpumask.
Now, make init_rescuer() use wq_unbound_cpumask for rescuer's affinity
and make all the paths consistent.
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshan.ljs@antgroup.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
}
wq->rescuer = rescuer;
- if (wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND)
- kthread_bind_mask(rescuer->task, unbound_effective_cpumask(wq));
+
+ /* initial cpumask is consistent with the detached rescuer and unbind_worker() */
+ if (cpumask_intersects(wq_unbound_cpumask, cpu_active_mask))
+ kthread_bind_mask(rescuer->task, wq_unbound_cpumask);
else
kthread_bind_mask(rescuer->task, cpu_possible_mask);
+
wake_up_process(rescuer->task);
return 0;