From: Gou Hao Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2025 01:35:06 +0000 (+0800) Subject: xfs-doc: Fix typo error X-Git-Url: https://gentwo.org/gitweb/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=1f37cae5d1c7c36c7bf7d2a5f5ebb3bc4a87020b;p=linux%2F.git xfs-doc: Fix typo error Online fsck may take longer than offline fsck... Signed-off-by: Gou Hao Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet Message-ID: <20251105013506.358-1-gouhao@uniontech.com> --- diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/xfs/xfs-online-fsck-design.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/xfs/xfs-online-fsck-design.rst index 8cbcd3c26434..55e727b5f12e 100644 --- a/Documentation/filesystems/xfs/xfs-online-fsck-design.rst +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/xfs/xfs-online-fsck-design.rst @@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ sharing and lock acquisition rules as the regular filesystem. This means that scrub cannot take *any* shortcuts to save time, because doing so could lead to concurrency problems. In other words, online fsck is not a complete replacement for offline fsck, and -a complete run of online fsck may take longer than online fsck. +a complete run of online fsck may take longer than offline fsck. However, both of these limitations are acceptable tradeoffs to satisfy the different motivations of online fsck, which are to **minimize system downtime** and to **increase predictability of operation**.