From: Alok Tiwari Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2025 05:01:09 +0000 (-0800) Subject: io_uring: fix typos and comment wording X-Git-Url: https://gentwo.org/gitweb/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=59f44afbe8cfe7904e8cf8d2bb67eb86b79e58da;p=linux%2F.git io_uring: fix typos and comment wording Corrected spelling mistakes in comments "reuqests" -> "requests", "noifications" -> "notifications", "seperately" -> "separately"). Fixed a small grammar issue ("then" -> "than"). Updated "flag" -> "flags" in fdinfo.c Signed-off-by: Alok Tiwari Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe --- diff --git a/io_uring/fdinfo.c b/io_uring/fdinfo.c index ac6e7edc7027..7bc985bcc56d 100644 --- a/io_uring/fdinfo.c +++ b/io_uring/fdinfo.c @@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ static void __io_uring_show_fdinfo(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct seq_file *m) cqe = &r->cqes[(cq_head & cq_mask)]; if (cqe->flags & IORING_CQE_F_32 || ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_CQE32) cqe32 = true; - seq_printf(m, "%5u: user_data:%llu, res:%d, flag:%x", + seq_printf(m, "%5u: user_data:%llu, res:%d, flags:%x", cq_head & cq_mask, cqe->user_data, cqe->res, cqe->flags); if (cqe32) diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.c b/io_uring/io_uring.c index 3f0489261d11..2d49b48568ab 100644 --- a/io_uring/io_uring.c +++ b/io_uring/io_uring.c @@ -882,7 +882,7 @@ bool io_post_aux_cqe(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, u64 user_data, s32 res, u32 cflags } /* - * Must be called from inline task_work so we now a flush will happen later, + * Must be called from inline task_work so we know a flush will happen later, * and obviously with ctx->uring_lock held (tw always has that). */ void io_add_aux_cqe(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, u64 user_data, s32 res, u32 cflags) @@ -1209,7 +1209,7 @@ static void io_req_local_work_add(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned flags) BUILD_BUG_ON(IO_CQ_WAKE_FORCE <= IORING_MAX_CQ_ENTRIES); /* - * We don't know how many reuqests is there in the link and whether + * We don't know how many requests there are in the link and whether * they can even be queued lazily, fall back to non-lazy. */ if (req->flags & IO_REQ_LINK_FLAGS) diff --git a/io_uring/notif.c b/io_uring/notif.c index 9960bb2a32d5..f476775ba44b 100644 --- a/io_uring/notif.c +++ b/io_uring/notif.c @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ static int io_link_skb(struct sk_buff *skb, struct ubuf_info *uarg) prev_nd = container_of(prev_uarg, struct io_notif_data, uarg); prev_notif = cmd_to_io_kiocb(prev_nd); - /* make sure all noifications can be finished in the same task_work */ + /* make sure all notifications can be finished in the same task_work */ if (unlikely(notif->ctx != prev_notif->ctx || notif->tctx != prev_notif->tctx)) return -EEXIST; diff --git a/io_uring/rw.c b/io_uring/rw.c index 828ac4f902b4..a943f879bccd 100644 --- a/io_uring/rw.c +++ b/io_uring/rw.c @@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ static void io_req_rw_cleanup(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags) * This is really a bug in the core code that does this, any issue * path should assume that a successful (or -EIOCBQUEUED) return can * mean that the underlying data can be gone at any time. But that - * should be fixed seperately, and then this check could be killed. + * should be fixed separately, and then this check could be killed. */ if (!(req->flags & (REQ_F_REISSUE | REQ_F_REFCOUNT))) { req->flags &= ~REQ_F_NEED_CLEANUP; @@ -349,7 +349,7 @@ static int io_prep_rwv(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe, /* * Have to do this validation here, as this is in io_read() rw->len - * might have chanaged due to buffer selection + * might have changed due to buffer selection */ return io_iov_buffer_select_prep(req); } @@ -1020,7 +1020,7 @@ static int __io_read(struct io_kiocb *req, struct io_br_sel *sel, iov_iter_restore(&io->iter, &io->iter_state); } while (ret > 0); done: - /* it's faster to check here then delegate to kfree */ + /* it's faster to check here than delegate to kfree */ return ret; }